I love you. That’s exactly what I was looking for. Long live Hevilix !
I love you. That’s exactly what I was looking for. Long live Hevilix !
You should watch the movie Idiocraty.
Not consumer minded. Citizen minded.
“Cures for cancers” then
I’m just there for a cheap joke. Hope it didn’t hurt ! (BTW I have already been given the boot by HR. Can’t correctly express my feeling about them.)
Plot twist: 95% of the engineering team was fired once the code was “done”. Including the poor schmuck who authored this.
But but but … Elon, the Free Market ! You can’t ask for regulation, that immoral. You, the champion of Freedom, how sad this is …
Regardless of the very subject of the post, linear types and do.. final
constructs would be a welcomed addition.
Ok help me there. What am I looking at ?
Warning: in the first case “value” is actually a shared reference, not a value.
You could argue that C++'s new is Rust’s Box::new, and delete is replaced by RAII. Same concepts but way better ergonomy.
I find it’s a mix between ML languages and C++, and knowing one of them would help yes. If you’re tired if chasing a wild pointer because of a subtle use-after-free in a multithreaded monster under gdb, you’ll love #rust.
The reality is probably that kernel developers don’t get any younger nowadays. And believe me, when you get older, have children and less free time, your waistline suffers a bit. Or even a bit more than a bit.
I’ll start.
0.0.0.1: Sophie
Your turn.
That’s a hell of a comment !
That thing is rock solid, it’s nearly magical.
No fap on dat.