![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/0d5e3a0e-e79d-4062-a7bc-ccc1e7baacf1.png)
Same thing happened to me when I tried to update my phone number and address at the same time.
Same thing happened to me when I tried to update my phone number and address at the same time.
Give the crested geckos their independence! (My only knowledge of New Caledonia is gecko-based).
Which is better, “urine us” or “your anus”?
The luck bit really clashes with the survivorship bias.
He needs a bike with like 1000 gears
You’re right that default credentials should have gone away a decade ago. From my experience with security cameras, default credentials were the norm ~5 years ago and now most prompt you to create a unique password. That industry typically lags slightly in infosec best practices. I would expect routers to require a higher level of security.
Please tell me everyone has figured out that all large companies are pure fucking evil
Fixed that for you
I agree that microtransactions and loot boxes in gaming need regulation as well. Hopefully this is a step towards that.
Any protections to consumers are a win. I think overall this will be a positive for gamers.
IMHO this ruling is shortsighted and pushes for a future with increased monitisation that isn’t in the box value of the game and targets to hurt the Devs that make consumer friendly games while giving games with loot boxes and microtransactions an advantage in the market when talking in terms of overall sales for the devs.
Your last paragraph could hold some truth if publishers think this will affect profits. I don’t know if this would significantly impact profits since we’re talking about a new secondary market that did not exist in the digital space before. There’s probably some historical data for how physical used game sales affect new game sales but it might be hard to quantify since that market has existed pretty much from the beginning.
I would anticipate another across the board price increase for games as a result, but I see this more as an excuse for greed on the publishers’ parts rather than a cost to offset any actual lost revenue.
That reminds me of this study I read that anyone will believe anything that looks like a screenshot of a reputable news article.
You could make so much money playing Russian roulette!
They’re standing inside him.
He spent a bunch of dough on that hair. I believe he is likely aware of his appearance. He is pale and overweight because he spends a bunch of time playing video games, being a nazi in his failing social media site, and (based on this picture) eating french fries.
Maybe at some point his vanity will compel him to get liposuction or just go full orange man with spray tan and wear baggy suits with ties that are too long. I don’t see him being like Bezos or Zuck and getting into shape.
Actually, it was Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.
/s
The only thing I would add to this is carefully use a hair dryer to loosen the adhesive on the sticker first. Should leave less mess for the goo gone to deal with.
I remember this episode of Malcolm in the Middle
Even the name Penguin is a hybrid of polar and penguin.
I like my burger like I like my jeans: high and tight.
Businesses of a different industry can use the same name. There is nothing keeping you from using the website for blogging. The computer store might be problematic if it could be construed you are trying to profit from EA’s established trademark. Also, why would you want a .org for a storefront? I’d say get a different domain for your computer store.