Stuxnet would like a chat with you
Stuxnet would like a chat with you
Sounds like you should find a new product to use.
And would you call SSH a library?
Look. Doing A-E is going to be expensive enough for the young fella. I don’t think he can also afford gunshot wound treatment.
To be fair, this is a classical strategi in startups called “wizard of Oz prototyping” - it is used to test if there is a market for something before the tech is ready. But the tech is supposed to be created soon after and actually work…
Makes me realize I haven’t seen a dickbutt in years.
Imagine sitting in a bathroom stall, with a gorilla pounding full force on the door, you just waiting for it to break, knowing full well that you will be crushed soon.
Just like Tolkien wrote it.
Looks like a pretty simple breach of privacy to me.
But if you want to know your saving, you will need to dust off the old formula. And if you do, you find the maximum saving to be around 41% (in the case of isosceles right triangle where the hypotenuse is a factor of sqrt 2 shorter).
To make room for the pennies
Always has been
Well, according to the first biography about him, he was coding quite a lot in Zip2 and perhaps also some in early PayPal. Bit the code was supposedly hastily written and very bad.
I will give you an upvote for maintaining critical thinking, but I will say that the book is not that bad. And it is really well written and interesting, but might be favoring SBF more than other books. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle.
Read “Going Infinite” which describes the rise and tall of FTX and SBF. “isn’t smart” is not true, but he is definitely not “human smart”, but rather “math smart”.
What kind of “guess the billionaire” game is this?
Or import this
Let me take a stab at it:
Problem: Given two list of length n, find what elements the two list have in common. (we assume that there are not duplicates within a single list)
Naive solution: For each element in the first list, check if it appears in the second.
Bogo solution: For each permutation of the first list and for each permutation of the second list, check if the first item in each list is the same. If so, report in the output (and make sure to only report it once).