Nope, those mean different things!

If I didn’t like it, I wouldn’t post it

Means (or implies)…

“I didn’t like it, so I won’t post it”, but it’s phrased as a conditional statement.

It also means that it’s hypothetical – nothing was posted!

But…

If I didn’t like it, I wouldn’t have posted it

Means (or implies)…

“I like it, so I posted it”, again phrased as a conditional statement.

It also means that the thing actually happened (because the commenter liked it).

So they have similar, but different meanings. The key difference is whether the commenter is saying they have already posted something or not. One is hypothetical, and the other is more of a reflection of something that did happen.

Also, I think this part of your comment is incorrect.

Should not it be

This should be…

Shouldn’t it be

(This is what people say probably 99% of the time)

Or

Should it not be

(This is less common and more formal)

And yes, I know that it looks like the “not” should be directly after the “should” because of “shouldn’t”, but it doesn’t happen that way. I think this happens when forming a question with conditional verbs (should/would/could), but I have no idea why.

As I’m sure you know, English is crazy. Sorry about that. Hope this helps!

I hope that’s not the only lens you see the world through. I don’t think anybody else saw that comment the way you did.

I’m glad I’m not the only one who has ever done that! Haha

I think it’s because dreams are “run” by the part of the brain that evolved in nature, and doesn’t access the parts of the brain we use to access much of anything we’ve invented.

I occasionally have/had dreams about writing tests. There’s almost always a problem with both being able to read the question and being able to write the answer! Lol

They were making a reference to boot licking

What did people do when I was bored?

They were doing fun things that I didn’t want to do. Maybe play sports, or experiment with drugs? Lol

EDIT: The comment above me originally implied that the other commenter was racist for using the word “marijuana”. They edited their comment to have absolutely no relevance to what my comment was about, which is fine, but they also didn’t mention that they did that, which is lame.

My original comment:

Marijuana is a commonly accepted and recognized name for cannabis. It’s the first “also known as” on the Wikipedia page for Cannabis.

Thank you for explaining that far better than I could!

Probably won’t help, but I find that headsets sound much worse when they’re connected as a headset. My (completely different headphones/headset) sounds a lot better in headphone mode.

I think as a “genre”, it refers to being more than an aesthetic, but also a setting. It’s probably bastardized by now from the original meaning, but I’d wager that looking into the etymology of steampunk might help you find what you’re looking for.

From there, it was probably like…“Well, steampunk, but with X! Xpunk!”

Sexual Aspects

See also: Yiff

I think the phrasing isn’t the best. I think he needs an “is what” before “hurts children” in the first paragraph.

If the Canadian Liberals thought it’d win them more elections, they would’ve done an election reform years ago.

…like they’d initially promised.

As the other commenter mentioned, it was a joke based on the typo in the title, haha

Your Ticketmaster questions have been sufficiently answered, I think.

What did you want to know about beaches in general?

Not exploitation? Addiction? Hatred?

could we do something about this?

Downvote posts that don’t generate good discussion.

Report posts that are flagrant rule breakers. (I report posts here that aren’t actually questions, or bad faith statements that are only barely questions)

But more importantly…

UPVOTE the good posts!

And even more importantly…

POST the kind of content you want to see! Be the change you want to see. If you’re just a commenter, you can’t complain that there’s no posts! Haha

I feel like this deserves a diagram

ftr; also atheist, but decided not to be insensitive today, lol