![](https://media.kbin.social/media/0d/15/0d15d366f2f979f85f55c67acf8cd38cdefd4f935cf71a76505ef42067ea42f5.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/CJ7moKL2SV.png)
Yeah the $ implies the word dollar, in this case becoming “239 billion dollars”
Yeah the $ implies the word dollar, in this case becoming “239 billion dollars”
The best programmers are, 80/20 is life
I’m coming around to agreeing with you. But I feel like if I try to clarify and really understand I may end up offending someone. It’s hard to have these kinds of conversations online, with people who don’t know you or your intent.
I may be an imperfect ally, but I’m honestly trying.
The issue was the use of a specific word, that is now uncouth, but with which OP identifies. They claim to not know the word had fallen out of favor. Other than the word itself, I don’t think there was anything wrong with the comment they left.
Agree that it’s not much of a reason to avoid a piece of software. If anything an instance.
This makes sense, I read somewhere recently that there actually is no evidence that people’s attention span is getting shorter, it’s just crap people say.
James Hoffmanns reviews led me to get a baratza encore. Quite pleased with it.
It uses small round paper filters, so you can grind finer and get different types of extraction and faster.
This kind of thing is why digital privacy is so important. But everyone is like “i have nothing to hide from the government”