![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://programming.dev/pictrs/image/028151d2-3692-416d-a8eb-9d3d4cc18b41.png)
That sounds awful. And a major loss to accessibility. Here’s hoping one of the standards gains traction as the one path everyone can agree on.
That sounds awful. And a major loss to accessibility. Here’s hoping one of the standards gains traction as the one path everyone can agree on.
I’m not up to speed on this issue, but it seems like the solution is to push forward with making the readers work in Wayland? Is there a technical issue with Wayland’s design that prevents readers from working properly?
That’s perfectly fine for some things, but for most people letting their browser choice dictate what sites they use is backwards
I think the trouble is that many people that need the reliable 7k car, also need the road trip capabilities because that’s their main mode of using their time off, because owning two cars and/or flying are out of the price range for folks that need a 7k car.
Until that’s solved by better charge infrastructure or better range (or both) EVs aren’t a good candidate for those folks and they’re a sizeable part of the market.
Seems more like it’s own top level discussion than related to the 1985 song. But carry on, who am I to rain on your parade?
Is there a community for lost lemmings?
Yeah. Just warning for those that didn’t watch it, starting off on the pig one thinking you’re gonna see the advertisement one could be a rude switch.
Definitely black mirror, but pretty sure it is not episode one.
I don’t think we should have to accept toxic behavior or content on facilitate discussions.
Perhaps the problem is that many folks are quick to label anything they don’t immediately understand or agree with as toxic, and if that’s what you mean I agree we need less of that.
Thanks! I agree some of what’s needed are more lurkers to vote up the little content that is posted, to get more folks posting.
I’m in, but mostly a lurker.
Did you forget the ./s or something? Lemmy itself is developed on GitHub, as are plenty of other “valuable” open source projects. To pretend nothing of value is built there is putting your head in the sand.
If you’re developing software on GitHub you have a chance at getting some useful feedback, bug reports and maybe even PRs. Like it or not, the network effect is real.
Future Idiots.
Patent Pending.
Absolutely. That’s a fantastic way to do the “copy/paste” I definitely think it helps when learning new language.
The reality is that you can’t. So accept that going in and realize your learning will be iterative.
You’ll be overwhelmed, that’s OK. Copy paste code until you get something working. Here’s the key. At that point stop, go back and understand the code you copied, why it works, and then try to rewrite it differently now that you know what worked.
Metaphor for writing. Start with a quote, then paraphrase it. Do that enough and you’ll start to be able to adlib and come up with your own solutions.
Can you read data off a floppy disk today? How many others can? How many in fifty years can? The point is that left alone our physical media of today is not compatible in the future because you need specialty tools to read it.
Anyone can pickup and read a piece of paper or a rock with carvings in it. The point is that not only does the media need to survive, but the means to make use of it needs to survive as well.
That is the key issue with technology today. Someone needs to keep loving the data from floppy to zip drive to thumb drive to hard drive to whatever is next or it’s lost.
Werfel noted that the IRS’ strategic plan over the next three tax years include a sharp increase in audits, although the agency reiterated it won’t boost its enforcement for people who earn less than $400,000 annually — which covers the bulk of U.S. taxpayers.
Saved you a click.
I fail to see the distinction:
story >> book (paper) == own
story >> movie (DVD) != own
That doesn’t add up. I realize this post is more about streaming than physical discs, but the point remains.
Former kbiner, but out of the loop on this one. What’s I miss?