![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/c47230a8-134c-4dc9-89e8-75c6ea875d36.png)
Checksums wouldnt work well for their purposes if they could easily be made to match any desired checksum. It’s one way math.
Checksums wouldnt work well for their purposes if they could easily be made to match any desired checksum. It’s one way math.
I was interested in Apple’s approach where they would look at checksums of the images to see if they matched checksums of known CSAM. Its trivial to defeat by changing even a single pixel, but it’s the only acceptable way to implement this scanning. Any other method is an overreach and a huge invasion of privacy.
For it to be tax deductible it needs to be a donation to a registered 501©(3) where no goods or services were received in exchange for the donation.
I was into film and digital photography for a while before I met my current girlfriend. Her family has always been into birdwatching. Once I realized the new challenge of photographing birds it was a whole new world of photography for me. It’s definitely part of my identity at this point. Enjoy this great blue heron.
It’s done by IP address not phone or laptop GPS.
This should be a standard option at annual physicals. Skip the BP check I just want out.
It must work like the music streaming model where Apple kicks back a fee to the devs based on monthly installs or usage to the dev. It probably works better than Microsoft’s model of buying a developer, not committing resources to run them, then closing the studio.
The subscription model is, in my opinion, dumb. If they need it to work, maybe they should buy games instead of studios. I can’t work out exactly how long term patching would work though, unless they kicked back a maintenance fee from sales and gamepass usage to the studio.
Those are better, but are also not phishing resistant.
App-based TOTP are not phishing resistant and do not require any level of proximity to the login session. The future is more likely passkeys that use device TPMs.
Hopefully they won’t have to provide a phone number to the restaurant
Just curious, why is that a deal breaker? It seems like a mild form of anti spam protection, potential 2fa backup, and a way to uniquely identify users.
Every game on Steam that uses the publisher’s launcher.
Not sure I’m ready to pay for search especially not at $5-10/mo.
Your link is to example.com