![](/static/66c60d9f/assets/icons/icon-96x96.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/u9kB0kgEaN.png)
He’s not blind! What’s he supposed to do with such a dumb feature?? /s
He’s not blind! What’s he supposed to do with such a dumb feature?? /s
I’m in the top ten in The Stanley Parable
I pay my delivery drivers exactly 0 tips. They’re paid a living wage, no tips needed.
No, I would tell you to avoid Ghent at all costs then!
Just make sure to avoid Brussels. Belgian myself and I hate the place.
Stopped there for a day on the way back from Spain. The walled Hamlet is beautiful, especially nice to stroll through the streets after dark.
I mean, yeah. Only one of both groups had both experiences.
Child free people love to shit on an experience they know nothing about, sure parents are ready to reply to those.
Nobody is telling people to have children…
It’s not about the absorption. They get soggy/slimy if you don’t immediately cook them
Not true. Some countries allow it on a national level, but many do not. I believe The Netherlands allows it, but only at lower competition levels.
I think FIFA forbids it entirely, but I’m not entirely sure.
I use syncthing, which works great unless you need a ton of space.
Could send it over ATP - Avian Transfer Protocol.
Does require a USB stick and for your friend to train a pigeon though.
So your problem with C# is that you don’t have the skill to use it? Unsure how else to interpret it?
Makes me wonder what kind of programs you make? Work with C# everyday, never really run into problems unless you’re working with the deeper Windows layers.
Not necessarily true
How does that “garbage” affect update time?
I just don’t get how someone convicted for ELECTION FRAUD can still be a presidential candidate
No, you have it the other way around. It means copyright owners can share “corrupted” versions of their works and the AI can still use it. Possible AI leaks won’t return the original work, since it was never used.
Of course I think this is only one aspect of why artists wouldn’t share their works, but it’s not the point the paper is trying to make. They’re just giving an aspect of how it could be useful.
It’s not what the paper is about at all, seems this is just shit journalism again.
All the paper says about copyright is that this method is more secure because AI can sometimes spit out training examples.
So trying to hack hackthebox is not permitted? Confusion is the name of the game