• 0 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 6th, 2023

help-circle
  • If your setup allows you to be a productive member of society, you’re golden mental health wise. /s

    You may want to get your eyes checked if watching HD video on a tiny screen seems preferable unless all your content fits your displays native resolution; I am fairly certain my eyes are terrible. Maybe that’s why I love that dark themes are becoming more popular.

    Transparency is nice, but Windows Vista is partially what converted me to Linux. I dislike rounded corners too, since content is always rectangular.

    I don’t know why no mainstream desktop OS really has a good mouse driven tiling setup out of the box. I have a dual screen setup, so I mostly just full screen apps and alt tab if needed which reduces distraction. If I’m trying to focus on a single thing, the second screen gets turned off.

    I find myself becoming more minimalist over time as well. Society seems to be more distraction driven by the day, so having an OS that stays out of the way is a boon.




  • Solving the fragmented community problem is something I’ve been pondering too, and the meta-community idea you described seems interesting.

    Obviously, a proper technical solution will be difficult. Federation comes with a host of challenges, as well as benefits.

    Giving communities the opportunity to be open to other like minded people on different instances would be beneficial to the network, for a number of reasons.

    If two communities on different instances have the same name, it doesn’t seem crazy to ask each of them if they’d like to federate with each other.

    That way, apart from instances defederating, discussions could continue even if individual servers go down.

    Of course, people love to hold on to their little fiefdoms, so the issue is as much social as technical.








  • I actually mostly agree and was being a bit sarcastic. Training on newer systems is prohibitive anyway as you mentioned. Sending personell is clearly provocative and should be avoided. I just find the argument that the military industrial complex ran out of the bullets to help is laughable.

    Obviously, production increases with demand and lags it causing stockpiles to decrease until output increases. Hopefully the quoted assessment is talking about that dip and not a more serious problem.

    Really though, Russia knows the US is obligated to help. They signed the memorandum too, after all. It’s hard to argue with someone that does so in bad faith, but continuing aid is hardly a provocative act.



  • Pretty sure the US is sending old surplus stock, and I’m sure the military industrial complex is salivating at the chance to resupply. Maybe if they send slightly newer stuff it might be over quicker.

    At any rate, US support for exactly this type of situation was agreed on in the Budapest memorandum as part of Ukrainian nuclear disarmament. Russia broke their end of the bargain and started a war under false pretenses. It is up to them to end it, exactly like it is up to the US to do so when doing the same thing.

    If the world can not unite to stand up to countries starting such conflicts, we shall never know peace.




  • I agree with his points, but until such a time when we figure out how consciousness arises in biological systems it seems difficult to be sure that creating an artificial consciousness is actually impossible.

    Of course such a thing would likely be orders of magnitude more difficult than an AGi and we’re much further away from that than people want to believe. Building an artificial consciousness seems like far future sci-fi to be sure.

    That being said, I think it very unlikely such a thing would simply be an algorithm, but there’s more to science and engineering than CS.