• Contramuffin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do that (100+ tabs open at any given time) due to my work (research tends to take up a ton of windows) and because I’m too scatterbrained to focus on a single thing at once, but even then I find that Firefox is really good and arguably better than Chrome. Maybe Chrome has improved since I switched over, but Firefox uses significantly less resources than the Chrome that I remember

  • blotz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s with all these comments saying Firefox is slow!? I’ve never noticed FF slowing down? I also can’t find anything online particularly damning (they all are pretty close in scores. No massive performance numbers for one or the other). I thought this was just a common misconception. Can anyone explain?

    • SuperiorOne@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Firefox is slower on synthetic benchmarks compared to Chromium ones but I’ve never seen a noticeable difference while surfing sites.

  • SuperiorOne@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Multi-Account Container with proxy support is a killer feature for me. I keep Brave as fallback just in case for PWAs.

  • CIWS-30@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is why I use Firefox. I honestly don’t think that a browser engine monopoly is good for the world. Single point of failure for everyone with no alternatives is very bad if something nasty happens.

    I think the creators of WINE said something similar about one of their reasons for creating WINE. Wish more browsers would use Gecko.

    • TONKAHANAH@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just wish chrome wasnt so fucking useful by comparison. its integration into my android phone is equal to none. the firefox browser on android is ok but it does not integrate quite as well as the whole google platform. then there’s the performance on linux. I hate to say it but chrome feels so much smoother and nicer to use on linux than even firefox does. I’ve tried making the full switch to firefox several times, last time I daily drove it for probably almost 3 months but eventually found my way back to chrome, it was just a more enjoyable experience.

      then there is the fact that every website builds their code to ensure it works with chrome, that is one advantage of chrome being the vast majority of the browser user pool, web devs can focus on making sure the one thing works really well.

      that all said, just like wine and linux, it is important that we have a completely separate alternative so we’re not entirely reliant should the ship start to sink. I’ve already fully converted to linux and its been my daily driver for a few years now, not looking back. I know plenty of people are still on windows but with ever new release it feels like they’re doing more and more to punch holes in the SS.Windows ship and i’ll eventually be a sinking boat for enough people who see that an alternative exists. Same will need to be said for chrome vs firefox

      • Dogeek@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Chromium being so prevalent means that it’s a monopoly (internet explorer anyone?) and it can control the web standards, which is something Google already does to some extent.

        They also push their agenda with extensions, manifest v3 being way less powerful for ad blocking extensions. All in all, the more people use Firefox, the less power Google has over web standards, and the more devs are forced to make sure that their site works on Firefox.

    • _I_@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually use Edge as a daily, but I also use Firefox because I want to support them. Unfortunately, Edge and Chrome are superior to Firefox in performance. Edge especially is really really great at resource management, and it doesn’t matter if I have 1 or 700 tabs and windows open. It’ll manage it without any issues. Firefox however, won’t. Sure, it’s rich in features and it’s very very flexible, but it’s not as stable or fast as the former.

      Still love Firefox, though!

      • Facni@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well if you use Firefox Nightly with ad-blockers and the latest version of Windows Defender the performance will be comparable to edge and chrome, the only thing is that Firefox uses the RAM that you are not using and that means if you have something open it will run slower.

        • HubertManne@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          cpu and memory on my firefox and edge are about equivalent but I have some browser add ons for managing lots of tabs. I have way more on firefox because its my main browser but I have a fair amount on edge which I use like scratchpad.

    • nonearther@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know if it’s just ethical or their unwillingness to improve but they have left a lot of issues open for several years.

      Issues like -

      • Auto dark mode for web pages - they removed it when Chrome for Android dropped it, but never picked it back up. All other browsers have it now
      • Geolocation on Mac. Their argument is weird for this and the issue is still there for over 5 years
      • A lot of changes nobody asked, something like address bar auto complete, which they forcefully changed to top sites without even giving options
      • Slowdown because of bloat - while a lot cliam that it isn’t the case, Vivaldi has brought my M1 Mac to its knees, even with brand new instace. Again only one to do so
  • Nioxic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firefox is indeed amazing but since chrome is so widespread a lot of sites primarily focus on supporting that - and thus i cant always use firefox. its a bit annoying

  • void@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    first of all, this meme gets posted a lot. second, but more importantly, the format should be reversed. in this scene of the film, Peter Parker sees clearly without glasses, and blurred with glasses, coz he’s been bitten and his eyesight is restored. /flies away

  • Engywuck@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh, look, THAT meme. Again. For the100th time.

    Folks, I don’t care what under the hood. Brave serves me much better than Firefox did. And, frankly speaking, “not being chromium” isn’t enough anymore. Mozilla has ruined Firefox for me when they started removing features (e.g., FTP support) and dumbing its UI/UX. So, goodbye FF, it’s been a long ride, but I’m on Brave right now.

    • branchial@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Brave is managed by Brendan Eich who had to leave Mozilla because he is a homophobe.

      That and they have been doing some selfserving things with BAT to the point where I wouldn’t trust them even if BAT became something worthwhile or maybe even especially then.

      • Engywuck@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Brave is managed by Brendan Eich who had to leave Mozilla because he is a homophobe.

        Eich was a cofounder of Mozilla. Wasn’t him an homophobe back then? Did someone stopped using FF because Mozilla’s cofounder was an homophobe?

        And, frankly speaking, I couldn’t care less about him or his believing. I need a good browser. Brave is a good browser (better than Firefox, for me). The day I find something better, I’ll migrate. Full stop.

        That and they have been doing some selfserving things with BAT to the point where I wouldn’t trust them even if BAT became something worthwhile or maybe even especially then.

        Again, the whole BAT thing is opt-in and it’s not the point here.

        • branchial@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          When it became public yeah people protested some websites were even putting up warnings for Firefox users.

          • Engywuck@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah, but people are still using a browser originally made by an homophobic guy. Shame on them! /s